Curated comparison
VOO vs VUG vs SCHD
Compare broad market, large-cap growth, and dividend-quality portfolio roles.
Dataset c480dc112b80 · imported Oct 9, 2026 · issuer evidence checked 2026-09-08
Open interactive comparisonDirect answer
The choice starts with portfolio role
VOO is the broad core, VUG is the growth tilt, and SCHD is the dividend-quality tilt. The choice is an allocation decision, not a yield contest.
| Fund | Yield | AUM | Expense | Cumulative return | Payout | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOOBroad U.S. large-cap core | 1.00% | $1041B | 0.03% | +840.0% | Quarterly | Conflict retained |
| VUGLarge-cap growth core | — | $235B | 0.04% | +1276.0% | Quarterly | Source-reported |
| SCHDQuality dividend core | 3.00% | $110B | 0.06% | +531.0% | Quarterly | Source-reported |
Yield, AUM, and cumulative return are source-reported and may use different as-of dates. Fees, inception, strategy, and payout cadence are checked against official issuer material. A distribution rate is not a total-return forecast.
Decision framework
Best-for distinctions and trade-offs
| Fund and role | May fit | Structural trade-off | Key risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOOBroad U.S. large-cap core | Long-term investors seeking a simple, low-cost U.S. large-cap core allocation. | VOO is the useful control case for many income comparisons: it does not manufacture distributions through options and retains full market upside and downside. Its current-income yield is secondary to broad total return. | Market-cap weighting creates meaningful mega-cap concentration, and the fund offers no protection from broad equity drawdowns. |
| VUGLarge-cap growth core | Long-horizon investors seeking diversified U.S. large-cap growth exposure. | VUG concentrates on growth characteristics and should not be compared with income funds on yield. The relevant questions are valuation, concentration, drawdown tolerance, and the role of growth exposure in the full portfolio. | High valuations and mega-cap technology concentration can produce deep drawdowns when rates rise or growth expectations reset. |
| SCHDQuality dividend core | Investors seeking a diversified U.S. dividend core with a quality screen and quarterly distributions. | SCHD pairs a concentrated dividend index with unusually low carrying cost. Its yield is modest beside option-income funds, so the relevant comparison is long-run total return and dividend quality rather than cash payout alone. | Its index methodology can create sector concentration and can lag growth-led markets for extended periods. |
Deterministic planning example
What a $10,000 position implies
Annual distribution estimate = $10,000 × displayed source-reported yield. The monthly equivalent divides that result by 12. Annual fund cost uses the issuer-checked expense ratio and remains separate from distributions.
| Fund | Displayed yield | Est. annual distributions | Monthly equivalent | Annual fund cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOO | 1.00% | $100 | $8 | $3 |
| VUG | Not available | Not available | Not available | $4 |
| SCHD | 3.00% | $300 | $25 | $6 |
This is a static arithmetic scenario, not a forecast or promised payment schedule. It assumes yield and expense ratio remain unchanged and excludes taxes, trading costs, reinvestment, distribution composition, and price or NAV movement. Cash distributions can coincide with a capital loss.
Reviewed research
Go deeper on this comparison
- VOO vs VUG vs SCHD: Choosing a Core, Growth Tilt, or Dividend Tilt
A portfolio-role comparison of broad large-cap, growth, and dividend-quality ETFs that avoids turning unlike strategies into a yield contest.
Evidence and scorecards
Review each fund’s source record
The comparison reuses validated scorecard facts and keeps unavailable or conflicting fields unchanged. Each scorecard provides its public review status, limitations, and approved evidence path without exposing the private ingestion registry.
Frequently asked questions
Questions about VOO vs VUG vs SCHD
What portfolio roles do VOO, VUG, and SCHD serve?
VOO is a broad U.S. large-cap core, VUG is a concentrated large-cap growth tilt, and SCHD is a dividend-quality tilt. They can overlap in holdings, but their selection and weighting rules create different concentration, income, and performance behavior.
Should VOO, VUG, and SCHD be compared by yield?
Yield alone is not a useful common objective because VUG and VOO are not designed primarily for current income. Compare the intended allocation role, fee, diversification, concentration, source-defined return period, and willingness to accept growth or dividend-factor tilts.
Method and limitation
The direct answer and decision table compare visible portfolio roles, costs, payout cadence, source-reported metrics, and stated strategy risks. No composite score ranks these funds. Source-defined cumulative returns can cover different periods and are not treated as like-for-like performance. This educational comparison does not account for your taxes, time horizon, other holdings, or suitability.
Read the methodology and financial disclaimer, then confirm current facts with each issuer.