Explore 158 funds using source-reported directory data. 25 scorecards add in-depth issuer-evidence review; inclusion is not a recommendation.
25 of 158 matching ETFs displayed — search, sort, and filter the complete directory.
Sorted by fund size — not quality, performance, or suitability.
Dataset imported Oct 8, 2026 · Source-reported values may have different effective dates. Methodology
Name | Payout | Decay | Compare | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | $1041.3B | 0.03% | +840.0% | Quarterly | Vanguard | No | A+ | ||
| Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.40% | $111.1B | 0.04% | +608.0% | Quarterly | Vanguard | No | A+ | ||
| Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.00% | $109.6B | 0.06% | +531.0% | Quarterly | Schwab | No | A+ | ||
| Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.40% | $80.2B | 0.04% | +470.0% | Quarterly | Vanguard | No | A+ | ||
| Schwab U.S. Growth ETF | 0.40% | $64.3B | 0.04% | +1218.0% | Quarterly | Schwab | No | A- | ||
| JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.00% | $45.7B | 0.35% | +94.0% | Monthly | JP Morgan | No | A | ||
| JPMorgan NASDAQ Equity Premium Income ETF | 11.20% | $43.9B | 0.35% | +96.0% | Monthly | JP Morgan | No | A | ||
| iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.90% | $42.5B | 0.08% | +310.0% | Quarterly | iShares | No | A+ | ||
| iShares Select Dividend ETF | 3.20% | $22.6B | 0.38% | +587.0% | Quarterly | iShares | No | A+ | ||
| Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 4.00% | $21.7B | 0.07% | +195.0% | Quarterly | Vanguard | No | A | ||
| SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 2.60% | $20.7B | 0.35% | +472.0% | Quarterly | State Street | No | A+ | ||
| WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.10% | $17.1B | 0.28% | +414.0% | Monthly | WisdomTree | No | A+ | ||
| Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 5.00% | $16.0B | 0.03% | +50.0% | Monthly | Schwab | No | A | ||
| NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF | 14.40% | $15.0B | 0.68% | +65.0% | Monthly | NEOS | No | A- | ||
| iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.30% | $14.7B | 0.08% | +377.0% | Quarterly | iShares | No | A+ | ||
| NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 12.15% | $12.3B | 0.68% | +79.0% | Monthly | NEOS | No | A- | ||
| ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.00% | $11.1B | 0.35% | +249.0% | Quarterly | ProShares | No | A+ | ||
| VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.80% | $11.0B | 0.39% | +118.0% | Monthly | Victory Shares | No | B | ||
| Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.70% | $10.3B | 0.15% | +246.0% | Quarterly | Fidelity | No | A | ||
| Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.20% | $8.5B | 0.60% | +201.0% | Monthly | Global X | Yes | C+ | ||
| iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 5.00% | $8.4B | 0.50% | +142.0% | Quarterly | iShares | No | A | ||
| Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 4.90% | $7.9B | 0.56% | +219.0% | Monthly | Amplify | No | A | ||
| Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | 9.90% | $6.1B | 0.29% | +105.0% | Monthly | Goldman Sachs | No | A | ||
| Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.10% | $6.0B | 0.29% | +83.0% | Monthly | Goldman Sachs | No | A- | ||
| Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 8.40% | $3.4B | 0.60% | +106.0% | Monthly | Global X | Yes | B |
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Schwab U.S. Growth ETF
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
JPMorgan NASDAQ Equity Premium Income ETF
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
iShares Select Dividend ETF
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
158
Funds tracked
25
Reviewed scorecards
9
Published research
79
Records with no decay flag
Named human review
Open issuer-checked fund facts, source-reported metrics, portfolio-role analysis, and ticker-specific risk context. Inclusion is not a recommendation.
Evidence-bound analysis
Reviewed Sep 8, 2026
A focused comparison of three dividend-growth ETFs that highlights index rules, breadth and weighting, fee and yield trade-offs, and a practical checklist for allocation decisions based only on supplied issuer and snapshot facts.
Read the researchReviewed Sep 8, 2026
A guide to interpreting ETF distribution yield alongside total return, NAV, option income, return of capital, payout variability, and portfolio risk.
Read the researchReviewed Sep 8, 2026
A practical method for comparing ETF fees without ignoring strategy, option overlays, portfolio fit, trading costs, taxes, and opportunity cost.
Read the researchMechanical views of source-reported data, not recommendations. Open any ETF for its available return and risk context.
Mechanical screen, not a safety claim
Yield leaders carrying a decay warning
Fund size only, not quality or suitability
Dataset grades with return and decay context
Compare three low-cost dividend cores by yield, fee, breadth, and selection philosophy.
Compare three active monthly income funds with materially different equity universes and option overlays.
Compare full buy-write exposure across Nasdaq-100, S&P 500, and Russell 2000 portfolios.
Compare newer active premium-income ETFs by index exposure, fee, yield, and operating history.
Compare weekly 0DTE income strategies across large-cap, technology-heavy, and small-cap indexes.
Compare broad market, large-cap growth, and dividend-quality portfolio roles.
Compare two Nasdaq-oriented monthly income ETFs by option structure, fee, operating history, distribution profile, and risk.
Compare active monthly option-income exposure built around the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, with tax, concentration, and return context.
Compare two Nasdaq monthly income ETFs by active implementation, fee, distribution approach, live history, and capital risk.
Compare an active monthly equity-income ETF with a low-cost quarterly dividend-quality index fund by role, risk, and total-return context.
Compare two low-cost dividend strategies by quality screen, dividend-growth emphasis, breadth, yield, fee, and portfolio role.
Compare Goldman Sachs premium-income ETFs across S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 exposure while holding manager and fee broadly constant.
Compare Nasdaq-oriented and S&P 500-oriented monthly income ETFs with different managers, fees, and option implementations.
Compare a high-distribution active options ETF with a low-cost dividend-quality index fund by cash flow, strategy, tax, and risk.
Compare two broad dividend-growth ETFs by eligibility rules, portfolio breadth, fee, current income, and long-term equity role.
Compare a dividend-growth quality tilt with a broad S&P 500 core by selection rules, fee, concentration, yield, and return context.
Browse focused directories
Free decision tools
Put two or three ETFs beside each other for yield, fees, scale, payout cadence and risk context.
Open toolSet allocations for two to five funds and estimate blended yield, distributions and operating cost.
Open toolTurn a reviewed source-reported yield into annual, monthly and weekly planning equivalents.
Open toolExplore funds by yield, grade, AUM and the existing price-decay flag.
Open toolAdd ETFs to your portfolio to get started
Add ETFs to compare them side by side
Question 6