Curated comparison

QYLD vs XYLD vs RYLD

Compare full buy-write exposure across Nasdaq-100, S&P 500, and Russell 2000 portfolios.

Dataset 97e56f011b2e · imported Sep 7, 2026 · issuer evidence checked 2026-09-08

FundYieldAUMExpenseCumulative returnPayoutStatus
QYLDNasdaq full buy-write13.40%$8.3B0.60%+193.0%MonthlySource-reported
XYLDS&P 500 full buy-write11.00%$3.4B0.60%+103.0%MonthlySource-reported
RYLDSmall-cap full buy-write12.20%$1.4B0.60%+55.0%MonthlySource-reported

Yield, AUM, and cumulative return are source-reported and may use different as-of dates. Fees, inception, strategy, and payout cadence are checked against official issuer material. A distribution rate is not a total-return forecast.

Decision framework

How the choices differ

The underlying index drives much of the risk: QYLD is growth-heavy, XYLD broad large-cap, and RYLD small-cap. All systematically trade upside for option income.

QYLD: Nasdaq full buy-write

QYLD owns Nasdaq-100 exposure and systematically writes index calls. Its distribution rate is not a return forecast; total return can trail badly when technology stocks rise quickly.

Key risk: Full covered-call exposure limits upside, and distributions may include return of capital while the share price erodes.

XYLD: S&P 500 full buy-write

XYLD applies the classic buy-write structure to the S&P 500. Its broader underlying index reduces the growth concentration of QYLD, but the central tradeoff—income today for less upside—remains.

Key risk: The strategy can lag a plain S&P 500 fund during sustained rallies and may distribute return of capital.

RYLD: Small-cap full buy-write

RYLD adds a covered-call overlay to smaller U.S. companies, which tend to be more volatile than large caps. Higher option premiums do not eliminate the underlying companies’ balance-sheet and economic sensitivity.

Key risk: Small-cap drawdowns, limited upside, distribution variability, and return of capital can all pressure long-run wealth.

Method and limitation

The conclusion compares visible portfolio roles, costs, payout cadence, source-reported metrics, and stated strategy risks. It is educational, does not rank funds for every investor, and does not account for your taxes, time horizon, or portfolio.